Address:
Bagrationovskiy proezd, 7, blk 11, Moscow 121087, Russia
Email:
o.semenov@els24.com — for cooperation
The water from the black fountain tastes just as good as the water from the white fountain.
17/09/2019
General Director of Spartak Moscow Thomas Zorn told why the club decided to apply for the famous CSKA fan Andrei Malosolov, who called the monkey forward of the red and white Luis Adriano, now playing for "Palmeiras".
"Is Malosolov's post about a monkey racist? In my opinion, Yes. Moreover, after the match in Austria, we discussed the incident with Leonid Arnoldovich, formed a common position of the club, "- reports the words of Zorn correspondent" Championship " Dmitry Egorov.
It is known that concerning Malosolov A. V. case of an administrative offense under Art. 20.3.1 of the Code of the Russian Federation about administrative offenses is brought. This article assumes responsibility for the Commission of acts aimed at inciting hatred or enmity, as well as the humiliation of the dignity of a person or a group of persons on the grounds of sex, race, nationality, language, origin, attitude to religion, as well as belonging to any social group, committed in public, including through the use of the media or information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet", if these actions do not contain a criminal act (criminal liability occurs for the Commission of repeated Commission of such actions, the person brought to administrative responsibility under Art. 20.3.1 of the administrative Code).
Comparing a black football player to a monkey has the hallmarks of a corresponding offense.
This article, as well as the administrative Code as a whole does not contain provisions that the statement on the committed administrative offense has to be exclusively the victim. Since the article itself does not disclose the Commission of what actions fall under the incitement of hatred and humiliation of human dignity, this unfortunately allows the courts to interpret the acts broadly and not in favor of the person being held accountable.
Explanations of the Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 28.06.2011 N 11 "About judicial practice in criminal cases about crimes of extremist orientation"can be taken as a certain reference point. Thus, paragraph 7 of this Resolution clarifies that Actions aimed at inciting hatred or enmity, as well as the humiliation of the dignity of a person or group of persons on the grounds of sex, race, nationality, language, origin, attitude to religion or belonging to any social group, entail criminal liability under part 1 of art. 282 of the criminal code only in case if they are committed publicly or through mass media or information and telecommunications networks, including network "Internet" (e.g., speaking at meetings, rallies, distribution of leaflets, posters, placing relevant information in magazines, brochures, books, websites, forums or blogs, mass emails and other similar actions for further familiarization with the information of other persons).
Actions aimed at inciting hatred or enmity should be understood, in particular, statements justifying and (or) asserting the need for genocide, mass repressions, deportations, committing other illegal actions, including the use of violence, against representatives of any nation, race, adherents of a particular religion.
Limitation period for bringing to administrative responsibility under article 20.3.1. Administrative code is 1 year from the date of committing an administrative offense.
The Perovsky court of Moscow will consider the case on charges of inciting hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity on September 27.
"Is Malosolov's post about a monkey racist? In my opinion, Yes. Moreover, after the match in Austria, we discussed the incident with Leonid Arnoldovich, formed a common position of the club, "- reports the words of Zorn correspondent" Championship " Dmitry Egorov.
It is known that concerning Malosolov A. V. case of an administrative offense under Art. 20.3.1 of the Code of the Russian Federation about administrative offenses is brought. This article assumes responsibility for the Commission of acts aimed at inciting hatred or enmity, as well as the humiliation of the dignity of a person or a group of persons on the grounds of sex, race, nationality, language, origin, attitude to religion, as well as belonging to any social group, committed in public, including through the use of the media or information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet", if these actions do not contain a criminal act (criminal liability occurs for the Commission of repeated Commission of such actions, the person brought to administrative responsibility under Art. 20.3.1 of the administrative Code).
Comparing a black football player to a monkey has the hallmarks of a corresponding offense.
This article, as well as the administrative Code as a whole does not contain provisions that the statement on the committed administrative offense has to be exclusively the victim. Since the article itself does not disclose the Commission of what actions fall under the incitement of hatred and humiliation of human dignity, this unfortunately allows the courts to interpret the acts broadly and not in favor of the person being held accountable.
Explanations of the Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 28.06.2011 N 11 "About judicial practice in criminal cases about crimes of extremist orientation"can be taken as a certain reference point. Thus, paragraph 7 of this Resolution clarifies that Actions aimed at inciting hatred or enmity, as well as the humiliation of the dignity of a person or group of persons on the grounds of sex, race, nationality, language, origin, attitude to religion or belonging to any social group, entail criminal liability under part 1 of art. 282 of the criminal code only in case if they are committed publicly or through mass media or information and telecommunications networks, including network "Internet" (e.g., speaking at meetings, rallies, distribution of leaflets, posters, placing relevant information in magazines, brochures, books, websites, forums or blogs, mass emails and other similar actions for further familiarization with the information of other persons).
Actions aimed at inciting hatred or enmity should be understood, in particular, statements justifying and (or) asserting the need for genocide, mass repressions, deportations, committing other illegal actions, including the use of violence, against representatives of any nation, race, adherents of a particular religion.
Limitation period for bringing to administrative responsibility under article 20.3.1. Administrative code is 1 year from the date of committing an administrative offense.
The Perovsky court of Moscow will consider the case on charges of inciting hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity on September 27.